22.01.2009, 13:15 | #21 |
Участник
|
В Вашем примере приходных операций будет две - для товара А и для товара В.
Как обе эти операции указать для одной расходной (товара ГП)? |
|
22.01.2009, 13:30 | #22 |
MCTS
|
Цитата:
Есть выход - это положительная операция (т.к. Кол-во на складе увеличелось), есть потребление - это отрицательная операция (Кол-во на складе уменьшилось). Расход в нашем случае используется для отмены операции выхода, соотвественно он и применяется к операции выхода (в нашем примере - это одна товарная операция). Приход же используется для отмены операции потребления, и применяется к операции потребления. Т.к. в нашем примере операций потребления было две - КомпонентА и КомпонентБ, то и операций прихода будет две: * Приход компонента А, применный к операции потребления компонента А. * Приход компонента Б, применный к операции потребления компоненты Б. |
|
22.01.2009, 15:05 | #23 |
Участник
|
Теперь понял.
Ну в общем нормально. Но все же производственные мощности... И еще. А не будет ли в этом случае проблемы в таком примере: Произвели ГП. Из Товара1, Товара2 и Товара3. Стали ее раскомплектовывать и в результате получили Товар1 и Товар3. Никак не соображу до конца... Но такое ощущение, что сумма от Товара2 останется висеть на каком-то счете. |
|
25.02.2009, 16:39 | #24 |
Участник
|
Цитата:
Accounting for By-products The general assumption with regard to a manufacturing process is that certain quantities of materials are consumed in order to produce a finished good and, therefore, a consumption transaction represents a decrease of the raw materials inventory. However, some manufacturing processes may in fact result in an output of additional materials/items. When this is the case, the output goods are regarded as by-products and represent an increase of the raw material/finished goods inventory. To account for by-products in Microsoft Navision, manufacturing companies must use the regular consumption journal and create a consumption record with a negative quantity. The quantity represents the number of raw material items produced as a result of the manufacturing process. When posted, the value of the negative consumption line is debited to the Raw Material or Finished Goods account (depending on the inventory posting group selected for the item in question) and credited to the WIP account. Clearing WIP when the Entire Output is Scrapped Manufacturers may sometimes encounter situations where at the end of the production process the entire output must be scrapped. When handled in the program, such a situation may represent a problem for the company from the financial viewpoint for the following reasons: As the produced quantity of finished goods is recorded and posted from the output journal, when the scrap quantity is equal to the output quantity, the total output is posted with zero quantity, and thus cost. However, regardless of the fact that nothing has been output, a certain quantity of raw materials and capacity was consumed to produce the scrapped goods. These manufacturing costs remain part of WIP inventory, even after the related production order has been invoiced due to zero output quantity. In practical terms, this implies that a certain amount is accumulating on the WIP account while there is no output to assign this cost to, and thus move the cost from WIP to finished goods inventory. To resolve the above situation, accountants may choose to do the following: 1. Even though the entire output is scrapped, post the output journal with a quantity of one. In this way, when the production order's output gets invoiced, the program moves the associated manufacturing costs from WIP to the finished goods inventory account. 2. Make a negative adjustment for the quantity of one for the finished item in question, and create a fixed application between the adjustment line and the output line to ensure the correct cost reversing. |
|